On Cushman Row, a Win for Preservationists and Historic Districts

The LPC listened to testimony, then delivered a decision that pleased preservationists. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

BY SALLY GREENSPAN (Member of the Board, Save Chelsea)| On Tuesday, May 14, the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) held a hearing on the proposal submitted by real estate investor David Lesser for 418 West 20th Street, a Cushman Row house in the heart of the Chelsea Historic District. Number 418 anchors the west end of a magnificent group of seven matching houses built in 1840.

Concerned individuals, members of preservationist groups from throughout the city, and representatives of elected officials attended the meeting to speak in opposition to the plans, as submitted. As Chelsea Community News previously reported, the proposal called for the demolition of everything but the house’s street facade, sidewalls, and front roof slope.

The rear roof and wall of the building, with its wood-framed tea porch, would have been demolished. A new, lower cellar would have been constructed to extend beyond the existing cellar, over 29 feet from the main rear wall of the house—and new basement, first, second, and third floors would have extended out at various distances into the rear yard, breaking with the ensemble look of Cushman Row from the back.

Had these plans been approved, it would have continued the slippery slope toward facadism which has been spreading throughout the city, threatening our historic districts and the preservationist community’s commitment to preserve the integrity of our architectural history. But the LPC, led by Chair Sarah Carroll, patiently listened to testimony by elected officials, preservationist groups, and individuals—and came down on the side of genuine protection, by rejecting the most destructive part of the proposal.

These red brick historic houses of Cushman Row (W. 20th St. btw. 9th & 10th Aves.) have survived intact since 1840. | Photo by Scott Stiffler

According to Hilda Reiger (of Victorian Society New York), “LPC approved the front area which are mostly repairs, the owner’s proposal for the downstep from the street, but required repairs/restoration of other parts of the building. Most importantly, they denied the rear expansion. The tenor of the commissioners’ remarks following the hearing was that all were opposed to the rear façade destruction. Now, they are even requiring that the owner redo the extension granted in 2006 to conform to what was permitted. Apparently, this was not done. This is the first time I’ve ever seen a ‘split’ decision about a proposal—but a solid vote by the Commission. It’s a new day!”

Among those appearing before the LPC in opposition to the 418 plans:

Elected Officials

–Carl Wilson, from New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson’s District Office, accompanied by Asher Baumrin, from NY State Senator Brad Hoylman’s office, read a joint statement from Speaker Johnson, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, Congressmember Jerrold Nadler, Senator Hoylman, and Assemblymember Dick Gottfried.

Preservationist Groups

Save Chelsea

Historic Districts Council

Village Preservation (aka Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation)

Victorian Society New York

Laurence Frommer, President, Save Chelsea, testified on behalf of the group. | Sally Greenspan

Civic Groups

Community Board 4

–CCBA, aka the Council of Chelsea Block Associations (letter in support of CB4 and Save Chelsea position)

Louisa Winchell, a research and preservation intern at Village Preservation, represented the group’s perspective. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

Individuals:

–Sean Morrison

–Wendy Solem

–Andrew S. Dolkart

–David Hemingway, on behalf of Carol Ott

Save Chelsea board member and CB4 member David Holowka, at the May 14 LPC hearing. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

NOTE: Contributions to our Community Voices section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Chelsea Community News.

Chelsea Community News is made possible with the help of our awesome advertisers, and the support of our readers. If you like what you see, please consider taking part in our GoFundMe campaign (click here). To make a direct donation, give feedback about the site, or send a Letter to The Editor, email us at Scott@chelseacommunitynews.com.

113 Responses to "On Cushman Row, a Win for Preservationists and Historic Districts"

  1. Pingback: wixxxx

  2. Pingback: nairobi

  3. Pingback: tumblr blog

  4. Pingback: health world

  5. Pingback: health blog

  6. Pingback: bangalore escorts

  7. Pingback: blog escorts

  8. Pingback: dehradun call girl

  9. Pingback: mumbai call girl

  10. Pingback: delhi call girl

  11. Pingback: bangalore call girl

  12. Pingback: manali call girl

  13. Pingback: escorts

  14. Pingback: mumbai

  15. Pingback: udaipr

  16. Pingback: jpdhr

  17. Pingback: almbo

  18. Pingback: udp

  19. Pingback: jpr

  20. Pingback: blogs

  21. Pingback: dcg

  22. Pingback: mcg

  23. Pingback: mum

  24. Pingback: mbi

  25. Pingback: wbflw

  26. Pingback: siteme

  27. Pingback: cgmum

  28. Pingback: mumcg

  29. Pingback: dxb

  30. Pingback: dxbe

  31. Pingback: gxcbe

  32. Pingback: blrcg

  33. Pingback: cghrde

  34. Pingback: gdye

  35. Pingback: rkshes

  36. Pingback: gdjend

  37. Pingback: ghti

  38. Pingback: cgdun

  39. Pingback: duncg

  40. Pingback: doon

  41. Pingback: rsde

  42. Pingback: lkcn

  43. Pingback: indr

  44. Pingback: cgdel

  45. Pingback: nesd

  46. Pingback: blr escorts

  47. Pingback: del escorts

  48. Pingback: rishkesh

  49. Pingback: rjprrd

  50. Pingback: kol

  51. Pingback: dehradun call girls

  52. Pingback: dehradun escorts

  53. Pingback: cg mussrie

  54. Pingback: rkishe

  55. Pingback: cgrwle

  56. Pingback: dwdrg

  57. Pingback: hadrwe

  58. Pingback: hrdwr

  59. Pingback: rkshish

  60. Pingback: cgls

  61. Pingback: cgles

  62. Pingback: chd

  63. Pingback: cgd

  64. Pingback: cgs

  65. Pingback: cg

  66. Pingback: call girls in dehradun

  67. Pingback: russian

  68. Pingback: jaipur girl

  69. Pingback: noida escorts

  70. Pingback: crtlnk

  71. Pingback: onpge

  72. Pingback: wrdprs

  73. Pingback: webflw

  74. Pingback: wbnva

  75. Pingback: almbro

  76. Pingback: crter

  77. Pingback: lcknw

  78. Pingback: indre

  79. Pingback: cgl

  80. Pingback: del

  81. Pingback: escrrr

  82. Pingback: esc

  83. Pingback: casino online

  84. Pingback: hazratganj call girl

  85. Pingback: gomti nagar call girl

  86. Pingback: height increasing elevator shoes

  87. Pingback: ghaziabad escorts

  88. Pingback: ghaziabad escorts

  89. Pingback: indore escorts nidhi nagar

  90. Pingback: visit site

  91. Pingback: buy Malabar coast mushrooms online

  92. Pingback: เด็กเอ็น

  93. Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  94. Pingback: find out this here

  95. Pingback: Spy cam Porn

  96. Pingback: sbobet

  97. Pingback: dumps shop legit 2022

  98. Pingback: สล็อตวอเลท ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ

  99. Pingback: legit vendor track1,2

  100. Pingback: Sobha Apartments

  101. Pingback: jetsadabet

  102. Pingback: sex chat kostenlos via whatsapp

  103. Pingback: Chat Croute Sang Sexe

  104. Pingback: rent scooters in st pete beach

  105. Pingback: sbo

  106. Pingback: ccv shop

  107. Pingback: wow slot

  108. Pingback: How do dogs react to CBD dog treats? - Quora

  109. Pingback: บาคาร่า1688

  110. Pingback: kardinal stick

  111. Pingback: Alrasheed University College |rasheed|alrasheed college

  112. Pingback: ccv dumps

  113. Pingback: canik tp9 sc

You must be logged in to post a comment Login