On Cushman Row, a Win for Preservationists and Historic Districts

The LPC listened to testimony, then delivered a decision that pleased preservationists. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

BY SALLY GREENSPAN (Member of the Board, Save Chelsea)| On Tuesday, May 14, the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) held a hearing on the proposal submitted by real estate investor David Lesser for 418 West 20th Street, a Cushman Row house in the heart of the Chelsea Historic District. Number 418 anchors the west end of a magnificent group of seven matching houses built in 1840.

Concerned individuals, members of preservationist groups from throughout the city, and representatives of elected officials attended the meeting to speak in opposition to the plans, as submitted. As Chelsea Community News previously reported, the proposal called for the demolition of everything but the house’s street facade, sidewalls, and front roof slope.

The rear roof and wall of the building, with its wood-framed tea porch, would have been demolished. A new, lower cellar would have been constructed to extend beyond the existing cellar, over 29 feet from the main rear wall of the house—and new basement, first, second, and third floors would have extended out at various distances into the rear yard, breaking with the ensemble look of Cushman Row from the back.

Had these plans been approved, it would have continued the slippery slope toward facadism which has been spreading throughout the city, threatening our historic districts and the preservationist community’s commitment to preserve the integrity of our architectural history. But the LPC, led by Chair Sarah Carroll, patiently listened to testimony by elected officials, preservationist groups, and individuals—and came down on the side of genuine protection, by rejecting the most destructive part of the proposal.

These red brick historic houses of Cushman Row (W. 20th St. btw. 9th & 10th Aves.) have survived intact since 1840. | Photo by Scott Stiffler

According to Hilda Reiger (of Victorian Society New York), “LPC approved the front area which are mostly repairs, the owner’s proposal for the downstep from the street, but required repairs/restoration of other parts of the building. Most importantly, they denied the rear expansion. The tenor of the commissioners’ remarks following the hearing was that all were opposed to the rear façade destruction. Now, they are even requiring that the owner redo the extension granted in 2006 to conform to what was permitted. Apparently, this was not done. This is the first time I’ve ever seen a ‘split’ decision about a proposal—but a solid vote by the Commission. It’s a new day!”

Among those appearing before the LPC in opposition to the 418 plans:

Elected Officials

–Carl Wilson, from New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson’s District Office, accompanied by Asher Baumrin, from NY State Senator Brad Hoylman’s office, read a joint statement from Speaker Johnson, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, Congressmember Jerrold Nadler, Senator Hoylman, and Assemblymember Dick Gottfried.

Preservationist Groups

Save Chelsea

Historic Districts Council

Village Preservation (aka Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation)

Victorian Society New York

Laurence Frommer, President, Save Chelsea, testified on behalf of the group. | Sally Greenspan

Civic Groups

Community Board 4

–CCBA, aka the Council of Chelsea Block Associations (letter in support of CB4 and Save Chelsea position)

Louisa Winchell, a research and preservation intern at Village Preservation, represented the group’s perspective. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

Individuals:

–Sean Morrison

–Wendy Solem

–Andrew S. Dolkart

–David Hemingway, on behalf of Carol Ott

Save Chelsea board member and CB4 member David Holowka, at the May 14 LPC hearing. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

NOTE: Contributions to our Community Voices section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Chelsea Community News.

Chelsea Community News is made possible with the help of our awesome advertisers, and the support of our readers. If you like what you see, please consider taking part in our GoFundMe campaign (click here). To make a direct donation, give feedback about the site, or send a Letter to The Editor, email us at Scott@chelseacommunitynews.com.

122 Responses to "On Cushman Row, a Win for Preservationists and Historic Districts"

  1. Pingback: forms

  2. Pingback: psnttion

  3. Pingback: desdb

  4. Pingback: dcdep

  5. Pingback: mapss

  6. Pingback: collab

  7. Pingback: jaipur

  8. Pingback: miley

  9. Pingback: ottawa

  10. Pingback: wixxxx

  11. Pingback: nairobi

  12. Pingback: tumblr blog

  13. Pingback: health world

  14. Pingback: health blog

  15. Pingback: bangalore escorts

  16. Pingback: blog escorts

  17. Pingback: dehradun call girl

  18. Pingback: mumbai call girl

  19. Pingback: delhi call girl

  20. Pingback: bangalore call girl

  21. Pingback: manali call girl

  22. Pingback: escorts

  23. Pingback: mumbai

  24. Pingback: udaipr

  25. Pingback: jpdhr

  26. Pingback: almbo

  27. Pingback: udp

  28. Pingback: jpr

  29. Pingback: blogs

  30. Pingback: dcg

  31. Pingback: mcg

  32. Pingback: mum

  33. Pingback: mbi

  34. Pingback: wbflw

  35. Pingback: siteme

  36. Pingback: cgmum

  37. Pingback: mumcg

  38. Pingback: dxb

  39. Pingback: dxbe

  40. Pingback: gxcbe

  41. Pingback: blrcg

  42. Pingback: cghrde

  43. Pingback: gdye

  44. Pingback: rkshes

  45. Pingback: gdjend

  46. Pingback: ghti

  47. Pingback: cgdun

  48. Pingback: duncg

  49. Pingback: doon

  50. Pingback: rsde

  51. Pingback: lkcn

  52. Pingback: indr

  53. Pingback: cgdel

  54. Pingback: nesd

  55. Pingback: blr escorts

  56. Pingback: del escorts

  57. Pingback: rishkesh

  58. Pingback: rjprrd

  59. Pingback: kol

  60. Pingback: dehradun call girls

  61. Pingback: dehradun escorts

  62. Pingback: cg mussrie

  63. Pingback: rkishe

  64. Pingback: cgrwle

  65. Pingback: dwdrg

  66. Pingback: hadrwe

  67. Pingback: hrdwr

  68. Pingback: rkshish

  69. Pingback: cgls

  70. Pingback: cgles

  71. Pingback: chd

  72. Pingback: cgd

  73. Pingback: cgs

  74. Pingback: cg

  75. Pingback: call girls in dehradun

  76. Pingback: russian

  77. Pingback: jaipur girl

  78. Pingback: noida escorts

  79. Pingback: crtlnk

  80. Pingback: onpge

  81. Pingback: wrdprs

  82. Pingback: webflw

  83. Pingback: wbnva

  84. Pingback: almbro

  85. Pingback: crter

  86. Pingback: lcknw

  87. Pingback: indre

  88. Pingback: cgl

  89. Pingback: del

  90. Pingback: escrrr

  91. Pingback: esc

  92. Pingback: casino online

  93. Pingback: hazratganj call girl

  94. Pingback: gomti nagar call girl

  95. Pingback: height increasing elevator shoes

  96. Pingback: ghaziabad escorts

  97. Pingback: ghaziabad escorts

  98. Pingback: indore escorts nidhi nagar

  99. Pingback: visit site

  100. Pingback: buy Malabar coast mushrooms online

  101. Pingback: เด็กเอ็น

  102. Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  103. Pingback: find out this here

  104. Pingback: Spy cam Porn

  105. Pingback: sbobet

  106. Pingback: dumps shop legit 2022

  107. Pingback: สล็อตวอเลท ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ

  108. Pingback: legit vendor track1,2

  109. Pingback: Sobha Apartments

  110. Pingback: jetsadabet

  111. Pingback: sex chat kostenlos via whatsapp

  112. Pingback: Chat Croute Sang Sexe

  113. Pingback: rent scooters in st pete beach

  114. Pingback: sbo

  115. Pingback: ccv shop

  116. Pingback: wow slot

  117. Pingback: How do dogs react to CBD dog treats? - Quora

  118. Pingback: บาคาร่า1688

  119. Pingback: kardinal stick

  120. Pingback: Alrasheed University College |rasheed|alrasheed college

  121. Pingback: ccv dumps

  122. Pingback: canik tp9 sc

You must be logged in to post a comment Login