On Cushman Row, a Win for Preservationists and Historic Districts

The LPC listened to testimony, then delivered a decision that pleased preservationists. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

BY SALLY GREENSPAN (Member of the Board, Save Chelsea)| On Tuesday, May 14, the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) held a hearing on the proposal submitted by real estate investor David Lesser for 418 West 20th Street, a Cushman Row house in the heart of the Chelsea Historic District. Number 418 anchors the west end of a magnificent group of seven matching houses built in 1840.

Concerned individuals, members of preservationist groups from throughout the city, and representatives of elected officials attended the meeting to speak in opposition to the plans, as submitted. As Chelsea Community News previously reported, the proposal called for the demolition of everything but the house’s street facade, sidewalls, and front roof slope.

The rear roof and wall of the building, with its wood-framed tea porch, would have been demolished. A new, lower cellar would have been constructed to extend beyond the existing cellar, over 29 feet from the main rear wall of the house—and new basement, first, second, and third floors would have extended out at various distances into the rear yard, breaking with the ensemble look of Cushman Row from the back.

Had these plans been approved, it would have continued the slippery slope toward facadism which has been spreading throughout the city, threatening our historic districts and the preservationist community’s commitment to preserve the integrity of our architectural history. But the LPC, led by Chair Sarah Carroll, patiently listened to testimony by elected officials, preservationist groups, and individuals—and came down on the side of genuine protection, by rejecting the most destructive part of the proposal.

These red brick historic houses of Cushman Row (W. 20th St. btw. 9th & 10th Aves.) have survived intact since 1840. | Photo by Scott Stiffler

According to Hilda Reiger (of Victorian Society New York), “LPC approved the front area which are mostly repairs, the owner’s proposal for the downstep from the street, but required repairs/restoration of other parts of the building. Most importantly, they denied the rear expansion. The tenor of the commissioners’ remarks following the hearing was that all were opposed to the rear façade destruction. Now, they are even requiring that the owner redo the extension granted in 2006 to conform to what was permitted. Apparently, this was not done. This is the first time I’ve ever seen a ‘split’ decision about a proposal—but a solid vote by the Commission. It’s a new day!”

Among those appearing before the LPC in opposition to the 418 plans:

Elected Officials

–Carl Wilson, from New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson’s District Office, accompanied by Asher Baumrin, from NY State Senator Brad Hoylman’s office, read a joint statement from Speaker Johnson, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, Congressmember Jerrold Nadler, Senator Hoylman, and Assemblymember Dick Gottfried.

Preservationist Groups

Save Chelsea

Historic Districts Council

Village Preservation (aka Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation)

Victorian Society New York

Laurence Frommer, President, Save Chelsea, testified on behalf of the group. | Sally Greenspan

Civic Groups

Community Board 4

–CCBA, aka the Council of Chelsea Block Associations (letter in support of CB4 and Save Chelsea position)

Louisa Winchell, a research and preservation intern at Village Preservation, represented the group’s perspective. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

Individuals:

–Sean Morrison

–Wendy Solem

–Andrew S. Dolkart

–David Hemingway, on behalf of Carol Ott

Save Chelsea board member and CB4 member David Holowka, at the May 14 LPC hearing. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

NOTE: Contributions to our Community Voices section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Chelsea Community News.

Chelsea Community News is made possible with the help of our awesome advertisers, and the support of our readers. If you like what you see, please consider taking part in our GoFundMe campaign (click here). To make a direct donation, give feedback about the site, or send a Letter to The Editor, email us at Scott@chelseacommunitynews.com.

129 Responses to "On Cushman Row, a Win for Preservationists and Historic Districts"

  1. Pingback: duncgs

  2. Pingback: delhi cg

  3. Pingback: lkcnw

  4. Pingback: velevt

  5. Pingback: udai

  6. Pingback: ud

  7. Pingback: mem

  8. Pingback: forms

  9. Pingback: psnttion

  10. Pingback: desdb

  11. Pingback: dcdep

  12. Pingback: mapss

  13. Pingback: collab

  14. Pingback: jaipur

  15. Pingback: miley

  16. Pingback: ottawa

  17. Pingback: wixxxx

  18. Pingback: nairobi

  19. Pingback: tumblr blog

  20. Pingback: health world

  21. Pingback: health blog

  22. Pingback: bangalore escorts

  23. Pingback: blog escorts

  24. Pingback: dehradun call girl

  25. Pingback: mumbai call girl

  26. Pingback: delhi call girl

  27. Pingback: bangalore call girl

  28. Pingback: manali call girl

  29. Pingback: escorts

  30. Pingback: mumbai

  31. Pingback: udaipr

  32. Pingback: jpdhr

  33. Pingback: almbo

  34. Pingback: udp

  35. Pingback: jpr

  36. Pingback: blogs

  37. Pingback: dcg

  38. Pingback: mcg

  39. Pingback: mum

  40. Pingback: mbi

  41. Pingback: wbflw

  42. Pingback: siteme

  43. Pingback: cgmum

  44. Pingback: mumcg

  45. Pingback: dxb

  46. Pingback: dxbe

  47. Pingback: gxcbe

  48. Pingback: blrcg

  49. Pingback: cghrde

  50. Pingback: gdye

  51. Pingback: rkshes

  52. Pingback: gdjend

  53. Pingback: ghti

  54. Pingback: cgdun

  55. Pingback: duncg

  56. Pingback: doon

  57. Pingback: rsde

  58. Pingback: lkcn

  59. Pingback: indr

  60. Pingback: cgdel

  61. Pingback: nesd

  62. Pingback: blr escorts

  63. Pingback: del escorts

  64. Pingback: rishkesh

  65. Pingback: rjprrd

  66. Pingback: kol

  67. Pingback: dehradun call girls

  68. Pingback: dehradun escorts

  69. Pingback: cg mussrie

  70. Pingback: rkishe

  71. Pingback: cgrwle

  72. Pingback: dwdrg

  73. Pingback: hadrwe

  74. Pingback: hrdwr

  75. Pingback: rkshish

  76. Pingback: cgls

  77. Pingback: cgles

  78. Pingback: chd

  79. Pingback: cgd

  80. Pingback: cgs

  81. Pingback: cg

  82. Pingback: call girls in dehradun

  83. Pingback: russian

  84. Pingback: jaipur girl

  85. Pingback: noida escorts

  86. Pingback: crtlnk

  87. Pingback: onpge

  88. Pingback: wrdprs

  89. Pingback: webflw

  90. Pingback: wbnva

  91. Pingback: almbro

  92. Pingback: crter

  93. Pingback: lcknw

  94. Pingback: indre

  95. Pingback: cgl

  96. Pingback: del

  97. Pingback: escrrr

  98. Pingback: esc

  99. Pingback: casino online

  100. Pingback: hazratganj call girl

  101. Pingback: gomti nagar call girl

  102. Pingback: height increasing elevator shoes

  103. Pingback: ghaziabad escorts

  104. Pingback: ghaziabad escorts

  105. Pingback: indore escorts nidhi nagar

  106. Pingback: visit site

  107. Pingback: buy Malabar coast mushrooms online

  108. Pingback: เด็กเอ็น

  109. Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  110. Pingback: find out this here

  111. Pingback: Spy cam Porn

  112. Pingback: sbobet

  113. Pingback: dumps shop legit 2022

  114. Pingback: สล็อตวอเลท ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ

  115. Pingback: legit vendor track1,2

  116. Pingback: Sobha Apartments

  117. Pingback: jetsadabet

  118. Pingback: sex chat kostenlos via whatsapp

  119. Pingback: Chat Croute Sang Sexe

  120. Pingback: rent scooters in st pete beach

  121. Pingback: sbo

  122. Pingback: ccv shop

  123. Pingback: wow slot

  124. Pingback: How do dogs react to CBD dog treats? - Quora

  125. Pingback: บาคาร่า1688

  126. Pingback: kardinal stick

  127. Pingback: Alrasheed University College |rasheed|alrasheed college

  128. Pingback: ccv dumps

  129. Pingback: canik tp9 sc

You must be logged in to post a comment Login