On Cushman Row, a Win for Preservationists and Historic Districts

The LPC listened to testimony, then delivered a decision that pleased preservationists. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

BY SALLY GREENSPAN (Member of the Board, Save Chelsea)| On Tuesday, May 14, the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) held a hearing on the proposal submitted by real estate investor David Lesser for 418 West 20th Street, a Cushman Row house in the heart of the Chelsea Historic District. Number 418 anchors the west end of a magnificent group of seven matching houses built in 1840.

Concerned individuals, members of preservationist groups from throughout the city, and representatives of elected officials attended the meeting to speak in opposition to the plans, as submitted. As Chelsea Community News previously reported, the proposal called for the demolition of everything but the house’s street facade, sidewalls, and front roof slope.

The rear roof and wall of the building, with its wood-framed tea porch, would have been demolished. A new, lower cellar would have been constructed to extend beyond the existing cellar, over 29 feet from the main rear wall of the house—and new basement, first, second, and third floors would have extended out at various distances into the rear yard, breaking with the ensemble look of Cushman Row from the back.

Had these plans been approved, it would have continued the slippery slope toward facadism which has been spreading throughout the city, threatening our historic districts and the preservationist community’s commitment to preserve the integrity of our architectural history. But the LPC, led by Chair Sarah Carroll, patiently listened to testimony by elected officials, preservationist groups, and individuals—and came down on the side of genuine protection, by rejecting the most destructive part of the proposal.

These red brick historic houses of Cushman Row (W. 20th St. btw. 9th & 10th Aves.) have survived intact since 1840. | Photo by Scott Stiffler

According to Hilda Reiger (of Victorian Society New York), “LPC approved the front area which are mostly repairs, the owner’s proposal for the downstep from the street, but required repairs/restoration of other parts of the building. Most importantly, they denied the rear expansion. The tenor of the commissioners’ remarks following the hearing was that all were opposed to the rear façade destruction. Now, they are even requiring that the owner redo the extension granted in 2006 to conform to what was permitted. Apparently, this was not done. This is the first time I’ve ever seen a ‘split’ decision about a proposal—but a solid vote by the Commission. It’s a new day!”

Among those appearing before the LPC in opposition to the 418 plans:

Elected Officials

–Carl Wilson, from New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson’s District Office, accompanied by Asher Baumrin, from NY State Senator Brad Hoylman’s office, read a joint statement from Speaker Johnson, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, Congressmember Jerrold Nadler, Senator Hoylman, and Assemblymember Dick Gottfried.

Preservationist Groups

Save Chelsea

Historic Districts Council

Village Preservation (aka Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation)

Victorian Society New York

Laurence Frommer, President, Save Chelsea, testified on behalf of the group. | Sally Greenspan

Civic Groups

Community Board 4

–CCBA, aka the Council of Chelsea Block Associations (letter in support of CB4 and Save Chelsea position)

Louisa Winchell, a research and preservation intern at Village Preservation, represented the group’s perspective. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

Individuals:

–Sean Morrison

–Wendy Solem

–Andrew S. Dolkart

–David Hemingway, on behalf of Carol Ott

Save Chelsea board member and CB4 member David Holowka, at the May 14 LPC hearing. | Photo by Sally Greenspan

NOTE: Contributions to our Community Voices section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Chelsea Community News.

Chelsea Community News is made possible with the help of our awesome advertisers, and the support of our readers. If you like what you see, please consider taking part in our GoFundMe campaign (click here). To make a direct donation, give feedback about the site, or send a Letter to The Editor, email us at Scott@chelseacommunitynews.com.

138 Responses to "On Cushman Row, a Win for Preservationists and Historic Districts"

  1. Pingback: blog

  2. Pingback: ritka

  3. Pingback: home

  4. Pingback: doon models

  5. Pingback: model service

  6. Pingback: model

  7. Pingback: models

  8. Pingback: ritika

  9. Pingback: callgirls

  10. Pingback: duncgs

  11. Pingback: delhi cg

  12. Pingback: lkcnw

  13. Pingback: velevt

  14. Pingback: udai

  15. Pingback: ud

  16. Pingback: mem

  17. Pingback: forms

  18. Pingback: psnttion

  19. Pingback: desdb

  20. Pingback: dcdep

  21. Pingback: mapss

  22. Pingback: collab

  23. Pingback: jaipur

  24. Pingback: miley

  25. Pingback: ottawa

  26. Pingback: wixxxx

  27. Pingback: nairobi

  28. Pingback: tumblr blog

  29. Pingback: health world

  30. Pingback: health blog

  31. Pingback: bangalore escorts

  32. Pingback: blog escorts

  33. Pingback: dehradun call girl

  34. Pingback: mumbai call girl

  35. Pingback: delhi call girl

  36. Pingback: bangalore call girl

  37. Pingback: manali call girl

  38. Pingback: escorts

  39. Pingback: mumbai

  40. Pingback: udaipr

  41. Pingback: jpdhr

  42. Pingback: almbo

  43. Pingback: udp

  44. Pingback: jpr

  45. Pingback: blogs

  46. Pingback: dcg

  47. Pingback: mcg

  48. Pingback: mum

  49. Pingback: mbi

  50. Pingback: wbflw

  51. Pingback: siteme

  52. Pingback: cgmum

  53. Pingback: mumcg

  54. Pingback: dxb

  55. Pingback: dxbe

  56. Pingback: gxcbe

  57. Pingback: blrcg

  58. Pingback: cghrde

  59. Pingback: gdye

  60. Pingback: rkshes

  61. Pingback: gdjend

  62. Pingback: ghti

  63. Pingback: cgdun

  64. Pingback: duncg

  65. Pingback: doon

  66. Pingback: rsde

  67. Pingback: lkcn

  68. Pingback: indr

  69. Pingback: cgdel

  70. Pingback: nesd

  71. Pingback: blr escorts

  72. Pingback: del escorts

  73. Pingback: rishkesh

  74. Pingback: rjprrd

  75. Pingback: kol

  76. Pingback: dehradun call girls

  77. Pingback: dehradun escorts

  78. Pingback: cg mussrie

  79. Pingback: rkishe

  80. Pingback: cgrwle

  81. Pingback: dwdrg

  82. Pingback: hadrwe

  83. Pingback: hrdwr

  84. Pingback: rkshish

  85. Pingback: cgls

  86. Pingback: cgles

  87. Pingback: chd

  88. Pingback: cgd

  89. Pingback: cgs

  90. Pingback: cg

  91. Pingback: call girls in dehradun

  92. Pingback: russian

  93. Pingback: jaipur girl

  94. Pingback: noida escorts

  95. Pingback: crtlnk

  96. Pingback: onpge

  97. Pingback: wrdprs

  98. Pingback: webflw

  99. Pingback: wbnva

  100. Pingback: almbro

  101. Pingback: crter

  102. Pingback: lcknw

  103. Pingback: indre

  104. Pingback: cgl

  105. Pingback: del

  106. Pingback: escrrr

  107. Pingback: esc

  108. Pingback: casino online

  109. Pingback: hazratganj call girl

  110. Pingback: gomti nagar call girl

  111. Pingback: height increasing elevator shoes

  112. Pingback: ghaziabad escorts

  113. Pingback: ghaziabad escorts

  114. Pingback: indore escorts nidhi nagar

  115. Pingback: visit site

  116. Pingback: buy Malabar coast mushrooms online

  117. Pingback: เด็กเอ็น

  118. Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  119. Pingback: find out this here

  120. Pingback: Spy cam Porn

  121. Pingback: sbobet

  122. Pingback: dumps shop legit 2022

  123. Pingback: สล็อตวอเลท ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ

  124. Pingback: legit vendor track1,2

  125. Pingback: Sobha Apartments

  126. Pingback: jetsadabet

  127. Pingback: sex chat kostenlos via whatsapp

  128. Pingback: Chat Croute Sang Sexe

  129. Pingback: rent scooters in st pete beach

  130. Pingback: sbo

  131. Pingback: ccv shop

  132. Pingback: wow slot

  133. Pingback: How do dogs react to CBD dog treats? - Quora

  134. Pingback: บาคาร่า1688

  135. Pingback: kardinal stick

  136. Pingback: Alrasheed University College |rasheed|alrasheed college

  137. Pingback: ccv dumps

  138. Pingback: canik tp9 sc

You must be logged in to post a comment Login