Passionate Public Comments, at Port Authority Bus Terminal Scoping Session

Allen Kratz, of Hoboken, said he relies on the bus terminal for many aspects of his life. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti

NOTE: At the end of this article, see an update.

BY KRISTEN ANCILLOTTI | The July 10 meeting held by The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) was the first step in a 120-day public outreach effort to seek formal comments from elected officials in New York and New Jersey, the City of New York, neighborhood residents, and the public, regarding plans for the Bus Terminal Replacement Project.

The meeting, at the Westin Hotel Times Square (270 W. 43rd St. btw. 7th & 8th Aves.), was one of four held on Wednesday, with two at the Westin, and two at the Clinton Inn Hotel and Events Center in Tenafly, New Jersey and launched what will likely be a series of lively comment sessions.

The proceedings began with an explanation of the rules for the day, by facilitator Maura Fitzpatrick. Public comments would be limited to four minutes, and representatives of the PANYNJ were only there to listen, and would not be responding.

Ralph D’Apuzzo, assistant director of Major Capital Programs for The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, welcomed everyone to the first public scoping meeting. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti

Before the floor was opened to public comment, there was a brief presentation about the potential plans for the bus terminal. Ralph D’Apuzzo, assistant director of Major Capital Programs for PANYNJ, welcomed the group.

“This planning level process is the public’s first formal opportunity to comment on the proposed project, its purpose and need, the screening of alternatives, and the approach to assessment of project alternatives,” said D’Apuzzo.

He noted that the Port Authority Bus Terminal (PABT) opened in 1950, and was expanded in 1963 and again in 1981, adding 50% more gate capacity with the addition of the north wing. Now they are considering a new replacement project for three major reasons. The first is that existing bus and passenger travel demand crossing the Hudson is expected to increase dramatically. Second, the facility is aging to the point of functional and physical obsolescence. Finally, bus storage and staging needs to be addressed.

PANYNJ’s goals include maintaining and improving connections to subways and mass transit, providing a state-of-the-art terminal, improving pedestrian accessibility, and providing direct bus links to and from the Lincoln Tunnel.

D’Apuzzo then introduced Graham Trelstad, an expert in environmental planning and community design who works on the Environmental Team with PANYNJ. Trelstad broke down how the original 13 alternatives for replacement were whittled down to three.

The three alternatives being considered at this point are to rebuild the bus terminal within all or part of the existing PABT footprint; to convert the Javits Center’s lower level for a new underground bus terminal for commuter and intercity service, and the storage and staging of buses; or to use the Javits Center’s lower level for intercity buses and the storage and staging of buses, while PABT would be rehabilitated and handle commuter service.

Leigh Landon, with the assistance of a translator, requested that the needs of deaf people be considered when planning for improvements. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti

The floor was then opened for public comment, welcoming Leigh Landon, who is deaf, to start things off while a translator spoke to the crowd. Landon emphasized the need for visual communication for those who cannot hear.

“I’ve been here just over two years, almost three years, and I just started seeing in the subway signs saying when trains are coming or if there are delays,” said Landon. “Otherwise if you’re on the subway and they’re making announcements, I have no idea what’s going on. I’ll be on a train and people will start getting off and tell me to get off and I don’t know what’s happening. There’s no visual communication for me to understand, and I’m at a loss for what’s going on—and people often don’t have the time or energy to communicate with me or tell me what’s happening.”

Landon went on to explain that she wants to make sure that she has full access to all communication, particularly in the case of emergencies or important information, and that she is not the only one who would consider this a planning priority. “There are deaf people in this city and we do need to have ways to access information visually in order to have equal access and full communication for everybody,” she said. “If there’s no full access or communication, it’s really discrimination against deaf people.”

Trina Semorile, a longtime resident of Hell’s Kitchen, expressed her concerns: profiteering by private developers, and further gentrification of the area. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti

Trina Semorile, a resident of Hell’s Kitchen, was pleased to see there were multiple meetings happening, but would like to see even more, as well as a more in-depth presentation of what people should expect from the alternatives offered. She has multiple reservations about the replacement plans, including additional high-rise buildings adding to wind tunnels at street level, potential profiteering by private developers, and what she views as the attempted erasure of her neighborhood.

“If you want to build something, build it with public money,” said Semorile. “Don’t build private developments on public lands. Don’t sell off our public lands to private developers. They have destroyed a good portion of New York City by turning it into gentrified, mollified, neutralized non-neighborhoods. I personally resent the use of the term Midtown West and West Midtown in your literature. We are Hell’s Kitchen. We’ve lived here for a long time and I want you to stop doing that in your literature, and I want you to stop doing it when you talk to anybody about us. You make us invisible as a neighborhood. You make the people who live here invisible.”

Carolyn Grossman Meagher, the regional planning director at New York City Planning, read comments on behalf of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration. The comments pointed out the urgent need for multiple regional strategies to address the growing number of commuters from across the Hudson River, as the ability to draw workers from across the city and region has contributed to New York City’s success, according to de Blasio.

De Blasio recognizes the enormity of the project, and expressed desires for Port Authority to plan for all intercity buses, not just those currently housed in the terminals; to ensure no additional harm to air quality; and to work with city and local stakeholders to create a terminal more appropriate for a “global gateway.”

Julia Campanelli, representing the newly formed HKHY Block Association, spoke about how expanding to the Javits Center would lead to even more crowding in her neighborhood. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti

Some comments leaned more towards one option over another. Julia Campanelli, representing the newly formed HKHY Block Association (which incorporates W. 33rd through W. 35th Sts. btw. 8th & 10th Aves.), asked that they choose the option to build in the current PABT location, as the Javits Center area has become extremely crowded.

“Hudson Yards also will have 40,000 new employees, 4,000 residential units, over two million visitors per year—all of which will increase the amount of traffic in that area,” said Campanelli. “Adjacent to the Javits Center is a BoltBus stop, which also creates a large amount of traffic. The air quality and the noise quality in our community right now has decreased so much in the last four years, due to the Hudson Yards construction. Adding a bus stop there for Port Authority in the lower levels of the Javits Center would destroy our community.”

Tom Wright, from the Regional Plan Association (RPA), followed this comment by saying he was pleased that the option developed by the RPA to split operations between the Javits Center and the PABT was still in the running, and asked that all three options be given equal consideration, because building a second terminal may create additional capacity.

“Growth across the Hudson River has grown dramatically over the last generation and is projected to continue, and we have a system today that is strained in every part—cars, ferries, subway transit, commuter rail—and the bus is a critical piece of it and so we need to solve this and sort this out,” said Wright.

New Jersey resident Allen Kratz of Hoboken spoke of his reliance on the PABT. “I depend on the Port Authority Bus Terminal,” said Kratz. “It’s important for me to get to work, to go to church on Sunday morning, and to go to the movies on Saturday night.”

Kratz went on to say that he thinks the bus terminal should be built in place, adjacent to existing subways, and that he likes the idea of intercity buses arriving in a weather-protected area rather than the street.

Cathleen McGuire, a resident of Hell’s Kitchen for almost 30 years, said she liked the idea of a new bus terminal, as long as it fits the scale of the neighborhood. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti

Finally, 30-year Hell’s Kitchen resident Cathleen McGuire spoke of fears that the construction would be endless, and result in more high-rise buildings not in keeping with the neighborhood.

“I love the idea of a new, redesigned—brand new actually—tear that down, that monstrosity—a new bus terminal. It’s an excellent idea, but to scale. To scale for our neighborhoods, not another ugly glass high-rise that we have to look at,” she said. “I think if we take a hint from Jane Jacobs and have a wonderful new bus facility that is in keeping with our low-rise Hell’s Kitchen neighborhood.”

McGuire’s final comment, which became the concluding comment for the meeting, focused on the effect of these changes on one specific group, which brought the conversation back to what these public meetings are all about: people.

“I’m also concerned about the people who currently on some level occupy that whole Port Authority area, and I’m talking about the homeless,” said McGuire. “I’m wondering if in your plan there is something where those people are going to be resituated—something that’s humane. And I will end on that word: humane. Keep this humane.”

If you would like to make your comments known, you can attend one of the project scoping meetings that will be held over the next several months in New York and New Jersey. More meetings will be held on Sep. 5, and comments will be taken through Sept. 18. You can also submit comments through a comment form found at www.pabtreplacement.com, or email ReplacePABTcomment@panynj.gov.

There will be a discussion of the Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement Scope for Port Authority Bus Terminal at the Housing, Health & Human Services Committee meeting of CB4 on Mon., July 15, 5:30pm, at the Hudson Guild Elliot Center (441 W. 26th St. btw. 9th & 10th Aves.), in Dan Carpenter Rooms A/B.

UPDATE: On July 15, the Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement Scope for Port Authority Bus Terminal (PABT) was discussed at the Housing, Health & Human Services Committee meeting of Community Board 4 (CB4), at the Hudson Guild Elliot Center (441 W. 26th St. btw. 9th & 10th Aves.).

Christine Berthet, co-chair of the Transportation Planning Committee of CB4, discussed the current stance of CB4 in a phone interview the following day. Berthet explained that, at the moment, none of the PABT plans are final, and an official position will be put out by CB4 in September, after they have had time to get comments from everyone and have a full board vote. In the meantime, the board has sent a number of statements to Port Authority over the past few months regarding their three positions on the matter.

“One is, whatever plan they have, we would prefer if it was in place because we would prefer the solution that does not take away building and residential and other historical buildings in the districts, so that’s the first point,” said Berthet. “However, we need for this plan to be able to absorb all the buses which are in the streets, and that includes the long-distance buses so that we don’t have stops all over the neighborhood; and that includes charter and parking for buses which are all along our curbs. That is an absolute top requirement for us.”

Continued Berthet: “The second requirement is that they improve air quality, and that implies multiple things, and one of them is that whenever they build a garage or they build a building, it would be enclosed and have ventilation and filtration, so that when the buses are going back and forth and idling and waiting and queuing, they do not spew their bad air in our neighborhood, because we have the third worst air quality in the city.”

As part of the air quality issue, another consideration will be how to reduce idling by cars that may potentially be backed up due to more buses being in the tunnel.

Finally, Berthet pointed out that when the Port Authority created the Lincoln Tunnel, they cut through the middle of the neighborhood, creating Dyer Ave. “I think it’s very critical that they re-cover those cuts and re-stitch the neighborhood together and create greenspace,” she said. “So that’s the third requirement, is that they create sufficient greenspace to help the community and the neighborhood to heal after all these years of, really, an open wound.”

Posters explaining portions of the plan for terminal replacement could be viewed on the way into the meeting. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti
Graham Trelstad, part of the environmental team for the project, presented the three alternatives being considered for the bus terminal replacement. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti
The first public meeting regarding The Port Authority Bus Terminal Replacement Project, held on July 10, collected comments from the community. | Photo by Kristen Ancillotti

 

Chelsea Community News is made possible with the help of our awesome advertisers, and the support of our readers. If you like what you see, please consider taking part in our GoFundMe campaign (click here). To make a direct donation, give feedback about the site, or send a Letter to The Editor, email us at Scott@chelseacommunitynews.com.

129 Responses to "Passionate Public Comments, at Port Authority Bus Terminal Scoping Session"

  1. Pingback: jazz instrumental

  2. Pingback: spring sunset

  3. Pingback: jazz for study

  4. Pingback: bossa nova jazz piano

  5. Pingback: morning music

  6. Pingback: bossa nova music

  7. Pingback: work jazz

  8. Pingback: romance venice coffee shop

  9. Pingback: soothing piano

  10. Pingback: jazz coffee

  11. Pingback: healing meditation

  12. Pingback: piano jazz music

  13. Pingback: soothing relaxation

  14. Pingback: jazz bossa nova

  15. Pingback: relaxing jazz coffee shop

  16. Pingback: bossa nova jazz

  17. Pingback: smooth jazz

  18. Pingback: smooth jazz instrumental music

  19. Pingback: coffee shop jazz

  20. Pingback: outdoor coffee shop

  21. Pingback: relaxing jazz music

  22. Pingback: coffee shop ambience

  23. Pingback: music for work

  24. Pingback: jazz piano

  25. Pingback: relaxing bossa nova

  26. Pingback: relaxing jazz

  27. Pingback: cozy winter

  28. Pingback: jazz relaxing music

  29. Pingback: jazz instrumental music

  30. Pingback: healing therapy

  31. Pingback: calm music

  32. Pingback: snowfall

  33. Pingback: meditation music

  34. Pingback: coffee music

  35. Pingback: piano

  36. Pingback: relaxing music

  37. Pingback: piano music

  38. Pingback: relaxing winter jazz coffee shop

  39. Pingback: night jazz

  40. Pingback: christmas ambience

  41. Pingback: birds chirping

  42. Pingback: relaxing asian music

  43. Pingback: cozy winter jazz

  44. Pingback: focus jazz

  45. Pingback: sleeping music

  46. Pingback: water sounds 24/7

  47. Pingback: jazz music definition

  48. Pingback: musica de academia

  49. Pingback: harp relaxing music

  50. Pingback: tender piano jazz

  51. Pingback: best gangster rap

  52. Pingback: gym music

  53. Pingback: sleep meditation

  54. Pingback: jazz music

  55. Pingback: gym motivation

  56. Pingback: harp background

  57. Pingback: happy bossa nova piano

  58. Pingback: sleep music

  59. Pingback: beautiful relaxing

  60. Pingback: top gym motivation

  61. Pingback: cozy cafe

  62. Pingback: bonanza178

  63. Pingback: happy jazz

  64. Pingback: cafe bossa nova

  65. Pingback: workout playlist

  66. Pingback: rap music

  67. Pingback: spa music

  68. Pingback: type beat japanese

  69. Pingback: jazz music meaning

  70. Pingback: yoga music

  71. Pingback: trap

  72. Pingback: bossa nova

  73. Pingback: musicas de academia

  74. Pingback: peaceful music

  75. Pingback: gym songs

  76. Pingback: melhores músicas de hip hop para treinar

  77. Pingback: workout

  78. Pingback: exquisite autumn jazz coffee music

  79. Pingback: cozy jazz

  80. Pingback: calming music

  81. Pingback: better sleep

  82. Pingback: jazz

  83. Pingback: cafe

  84. Pingback: surf music cafe

  85. Pingback: relax music

  86. Pingback: best workout music

  87. Pingback: relaxing sleep music

  88. Pingback: water sounds

  89. Pingback: deep sleep

  90. Pingback: workout music

  91. Pingback: background jazz

  92. Pingback: japanese type beat 2023

  93. Pingback: relaxing music sleep

  94. Pingback: coffee shop music

  95. Pingback: seaside cafe ambience

  96. Pingback: cafe jazz

  97. Pingback: bossa nova piano

  98. Pingback: asmr morning

  99. Pingback: healing music

  100. Pingback: jazz ambience

  101. Pingback: relaxing

  102. Pingback: gangster trap

  103. Pingback: beach cafe

  104. Pingback: Meditation

  105. Pingback: relaxing piano music

  106. Pingback: https://www.advantageja.eu/supplements/phenq-reviews-know-ingredients-pros/

  107. Pingback: ป้ายบิลบอร์ด

  108. Pingback: relaxing sleep music

  109. Pingback: join the illuminati

  110. Pingback: Ventilatie cu tiraj fortat – sistem colectiv

  111. Pingback: DMT Vape Pens For Sale Melbourne

  112. Pingback: magic mushroom chocolate bar lyt

  113. Pingback: More Info

  114. Pingback: m.ytmp3.bz

  115. Pingback: magic mushroom dispensary​

  116. Pingback: morphine kaufen

  117. Pingback: สำนักงานบัญชี เชียงใหม่

  118. Pingback: sbo

  119. Pingback: พิโกไฟแนนซ์

  120. Pingback: Köp Methadone Online

  121. Pingback: Outsourcing DevOps efforts

  122. Pingback: sbo

  123. Pingback: สล็อตวอเลท

  124. Pingback: relx

  125. Pingback: Fire arms for sale online

  126. Pingback: click reference

  127. Pingback: mortgage

  128. Pingback: dumps 201 with pin

  129. Pingback: kurumsal sunucu yapılandırma

You must be logged in to post a comment Login